The Frontier Group - Blog

Ruby on Rails Perth Meetup

February 2nd, 2010, by aaron

Every third Thursday of the month we have a Ruby on Rails meetup at our offices. It’s a bit of a mix of some socialising and some tech sharing. A few of the guys share the same woes in trying to run a small business, or deal with clients, or implement some particular solution so it can sometimes end up being quite a mixing pot for solution finding and solution sharing.

I think in the year 2009 we’ve seen the group grow from a meeting of somewhere around 4-8 people each month to sometimes around 30. In December to celebrate a successful year of growth in the Perth Ruby community we went on a pub crawl down Barrack and Beaufort St, everyone seemed to have a lot of fun and it was good to take the show on the road. Generally we keep the drinking and tomfoolery inside the bounds of our office.

You can find out some more information at the meetup site but generally we get between 15 to 30 people attending and there will be talks ranging from using Capistrano for PHP deployments to Behaviour Driven Testing and a lot in between. In January we had talks on using Sinatra to setup some simple Javascript unit testing, using Sinatra and Rake to setup a simple management interface, and using Soap4R to interface with SOAP APIs.

The meetup is held in Unit 9, 1010 Wellington St from 5pm onwards. Beers and snack food are provided, you just need to bring yourself and a willingness to exchange ideas! The next meeting will be on February 18, 2010.

We are a web development company and this is our blog. We specialize in building web applications with the Ruby on Rails framework. You can read more about our Ruby on Rails development or contact us.


Using RSpec Example Groups for Common Functionality

January 13th, 2010, by aaron

I’m currently getting into using RSpec for testing our controllers on what is turning into a large project. It’s been more than handy because we have a lot of complex scoping to take into account whenever retrieving data. People don’t like to see other peoples’ financial data, mostly because it implies that someone is probably looking at theirs. With this in mind it’s more than important that we know the right data is going to the right places and hence the need for controller testing.

Now most of our controllers require the user to be logged in so writing tests to check this for every controller is annoying and time consuming, more than that it feels dirty. I think this is what some people call a code smell though I’m not up to speed on buzz words. There are also other tasks that are done quite often such as setting up the various types of users we’d like to test as, it would be nice if this were easily put in one place and could be easily pulled in. I guess I was looking for a template of tests that I could share.

It seems that the solution to it is found in Shared Example Groups which I hadn’t heard very much discussion about and it kind of leaves working out how they work to you rather than documenting it too much.

So far I’ve used it simply to make sure that controllers that require are redirecting users appropriately and also for setting up a specific type of user for our system before testing.

I created a directory under /spec/support called example_groups and in there I have a file called login_groups.rb. In that file I have something like the following :

shared_examples_for "customer is logged in" do
  before(:all) do
    @user = Factory(:customer_user)
    @user.customers.push Factory(:customer)
  end

  before(:each) do
    activate_authlogic
    OperatorSession.create(@operator)
  end
end

Now in my spec files when I have a bunch of tests requiring a logged in customer I will include this little snippet :

  it_should_behave_like "customer is logged in"

I get a logged in customer to start playing around with. I have the spec/support/example_groups directory in my include paths for Rspec and so it just all works.

My tests can then start to look like :

describe MerchantsController do
  it_should_behave_like "areas requiring login"

  context "customer logged in" do
    it_should_behave_like "customer is logged in"

    ... insert other tests here ...
  end
end

It means I can swap in another authentication gem/plugin pretty easily and also encapsulates the logic about creating customers, or whatever type of item you want to use, so that if that changes you can swap things in and out with a minimum of fuss.

Just to be clear, example groups aren’t limited to setup tasks or connecting to before/after hooks, you can also include a bunch of tests as well. This allows me to have a bunch of tests to run to make sure that a user does have to be logged in for various controllers and include these tests in on line.

I hope this helps someone, it took a bit of searching and trial and error myself this morning to get it working and find the uses for it that I’ve found. I’m definitely open to better solutions to this sort of issue though.

We are a web development company and this is our blog. We specialize in building web applications with the Ruby on Rails framework. You can read more about our Ruby on Rails development or contact us.


Why Your Clients Should Upgrade Their Web Browsers

December 3rd, 2009, by aaron

I think the IT industry has a tendency to push our clients and users to upgrade, or change things to suit our requirements or desires. Often times the reasons may be rooted in practicality, but as good IT workers tend to develop heuristics for problem solving they can sometimes find it hard to explain their reasoning.

A good example is browser upgrades. We all know it’s a worthwhile suggestion, and having the latest browser is the best option in most cases, but explaining that to a user or client can be difficult. It can be especially difficult if you don’t have face time with a user; the most common situation in the web environment.

Telling a user that the site works better in Firefox 3 or Safari 4 will, perhaps, just lead to the user finding a site that works better with their browser instead. It would be nice if we tried a different tact, and in doing so helped not only ourselves, but the wider community of developers. After all we want the same outcome : to have our work viewed the way we intended, for the minimum amount of work. Cross browser development sucks!

I was thinking the other day that I don’t think I’ve ever heard from a developer that users should switch browsers for security reasons, or any other reason the user would care about. Users don’t care about ACID compliance, or Javascript optimisations or any other technicalities. What they do care about though is security, especially now that mainstream operating systems, manufacturers and financal institutions have gotten the word out about phishing and other vulnerabilities.

  • All the latest browsers support some form of malware protection and anti-phishing protection. This increases user security.
  • All the latest browsers concentrate on process isolation and run time optimisations. This decreases crashes and increases browsing speed.
  • All the latest browsers have been improving standards compliance. This increases the likelihood that more sites will work for the user.
  • All the latest browsers manage their own update process. The user isn’t required to remember to stay up to date in the future.
  • All the latest browsers have the latest patches and updates and latest features. This gives the user the most secure, fastest, and feature packed experience.

We all know that unless you have a very good reason, it’s silly to be running an old browser. However when was the last time you explained the benefits for them personally? Increased security, increased stability, increased speed, more compatibility with other sites and the latest features available.

If you find a better way to sell your clients on spending 5 minutes to upgrade their browser then make sure you spread the word. Every user you convert is a win for the web community and the internet in general!

We are a web development company and this is our blog. We specialize in building web applications with the Ruby on Rails framework. You can read more about our Ruby on Rails development or contact us.


Embedding Dynamically Generated Images in Emails with Actionmailer

December 2nd, 2009, by aaron

We recently had to embed images into our emails that were being sent with Actionmailer, and as such we turned to the inline_attachment plugin to achieve this. It very easily parses your mail output and overrides the ActionView path_to_image helper to attach the file and create an appropriate path to the attached image inside the email while splitting your mail into appropriate parts as necessary.

What we needed to do though was embed a dynamically generated image into the email. The image didn’t exist on the file system previously so we couldn’t use the standard image_tag helper that inline_attachment was patching.

So we extended ActionView to include a new tag helper attach_image_file that uses the existing inline_attachment part management and just a properly referenced image. The methods from inline_attachment take care of attaching the file to the email and splitting the mail content into the appropriate parts.

Here’s my code. I just added it into my initializers directory :

module ActionView
  module Helpers
    module AssetTagHelper
      def attach_image_file(file)
        @part_container ||= @controller
        if @part_container.is_a?(ActionMailer::Base) or @part_container.is_a?(ActionMailer::Part)
          basename  = "barcode.gif"
          ext       = basename.split('.').last
          cid       = Time.now.to_f.to_s + "#{basename}@inline_attachment"

          @part_container.inline_attachment(:content_type => "image/#{ext}",
                                        :body         => file,
                                        :filename     => basename,
                                        :cid          => "<#{cid}>",
                                        :disposition  => "inline")

          return ""
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

It did what we need, and allows us to properly inline a dynamic image. You could use similar code to inline pretty much anything that your target mail reader supports. Apple Mail for instance may provide PDF previews.

We are a web development company and this is our blog. We specialize in building web applications with the Ruby on Rails framework. You can read more about our Ruby on Rails development or contact us.


How Much Can You Save on Coffee?

October 28th, 2009, by aaron

I just finished making a coffee with our office coffee machine, a Breville ES400 Espresso machine (it does the job!) and it got me thinking about how much of a work horse this little thing has been.

At The Frontier Group, everyone loves coffee. Some people love it more than others, and some people more specifically love the caffeine more than the coffee itself. In any case, everyone at The Frontier Group drinks coffee.

When I started here almost three years ago, we used to go to the local coffee shop a few times a day. It was lucky that they produce some of the best coffee in Perth, and at least at that time, were probably the making the best coffeee in Perth.

However three or four coffees a day can quite easily eat into your weekly budget, not to mention the inconvenience of having to walk up the road to get it.

So we bought a coffee machine. Nothing fancy, but not completely entry level. We figured that it’ll be put through it’s paces, we enjoy our coffee and so we wanted a machine that could cope, and cope it has. After two years of use only the gasket on the group head needs replacing, and that’s really only been noticeable in the last month or so! It’s literally been trouble free.

However, down to the post topic, how much money have we saved? I thought the following sums were pretty interesting.

Coffees Made: 2 years x 48 weeks x 5 days x (approx) 8 coffees/day ~ 3800 coffees
Coffee Used: 3800 coffees * 16g/coffee ~ 62kg of coffee
Milk Used: 3800 coffees * 250mL/coffee ~ 950L of milk
Coffee Cost: 62kg @ $50/kg = $3100
Milk Cost: 950L @ $2.20/L = $2100

So we’ve gone through 62Kg of coffee in the last two years, and 950L of milk. I think that’s pretty crazy!!

Now to the costings.

Equivalent Cost at Cafe: 3800 coffees @ $4.40/coffee ~$16,500
Our Cost for Coffees: $3100 + $2100 = $5,200
Saving:$16,500 – $5,200 = $11,300

The machine itself cost $400, and there’s sugar and that sort of thing I guess, but all in all we’re looking at a solid $10,000 saving over the last two years. That’s not even including the saved time in not having to walk down the road and that sort of thing.

Our little workhorse is a silver box that sits in the corner and saves us money :)

We are a web development company and this is our blog. We specialize in building web applications with the Ruby on Rails framework. You can read more about our Ruby on Rails development or contact us.


Follow Us

Stay in the Loop

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to our mailing list. You'll get updates about our products, specials and bonus offers, and general behind the scenes news from our team.

Twitter

Newsletters

Alexa Rank

Testimonial

The boys at The Frontier Group are amazing! For such a relaxed and personable organisation, they have phenomenal technical ability and a rampant professionalism. They have customisable solutions for all of my IT needs and they always deliver, on time and beyond expectation.

They fix problems other service providers can't and they helped me get a critical section of my web site up and running 10 minutes after I emailed the request!

Alex Hyndman, Nexus Car Share.

Featured Project

Case Study - Caudo Group - www.caudo.com.au

Website

www.caudo.com.au

Caudo Machinery

Caudo Group engaged our services to redesign their outdated website. We sent our photographer on-site to capture the essence of their business and turned it into a stunning web design.